Skip to content

Beta · Prospect Mode v3

See why each lead was included.

Prospect Reasoning shows you the chain of evidence behind every lead Geb places on your list — what sources were checked, how conflicts were resolved, why the MEDDIC grade landed where it did. Read the rationale per row, intervene mid-run when you spot drift, and ship outreach with full audit confidence.

Illustrative examples

(Healthcare-SaaS Co.)

Healthcare-SaaS · 140 employees · Ontario, Canada

Summary

Included because the company matches your ICP on industry (Healthcare-SaaS, source: CDAP + 2026-Q1 press release) and size (140 employees, source: OpenCorporates 2026-Q1 filing). MEDDIC score B+ driven by 47% YoY revenue (Metrics 4/5) and identified pain point in patient data interop (Identify-Pain 5/5).

MEDDIC (B+)

  • metrics: 4/5 — OpenCorporates filing shows 47% YoY revenue growth
  • identify_pain: 5/5 — CEO press quote names interop as top engineering challenge
  • economic_buyer: 3/5 — new VP Finance hired from a larger health-tech vendor (Nov 2025)

Verifier conflict resolution

OpenCorporates registered industry 'Consulting' was overridden by CDAP + 2026-Q1 press release 'Healthcare-SaaS' (cumulative source weight 1.55 vs 0.85). Press release predates registry update.

(Fintech Startup #2)

Fintech / payments · 55 employees · Berlin, Germany

Summary

Included because the ICP 'fast-growing fintech in Europe' decomposed to YoY revenue >30% AND primary_industry=fintech. Candidate matches on both filters via SEC equivalent filings. MEDDIC score B driven by clear product-market-fit signals (Identify-Pain 4/5) and identified champion (Champion 4/5).

MEDDIC (B)

  • identify_pain: 4/5 — public roadmap calls out fraud-detection ML stack
  • champion: 4/5 — VP Engineering publicly piloting 3 vendors
  • decision_process: 3/5 — 3-vendor pilot indicates structured procurement

Verifier conflict resolution

Employee count: LinkedIn estimate (48) vs OpenCorporates registry (55). Chose OpenCorporates (legal filing, weight 0.85) over LinkedIn estimate (0.45). Note: gap small enough to NOT flag for human review.

Dedup decision

Merged with cand_xx492 (same legal entity, different marketing brand). Reasoning: shared OpenCorporates registry number and domain.

(Agritech Series B)

Agritech / precision-agriculture · 82 employees · Iowa, USA

Summary

Included because the ICP 'series-B agritech in North America' matched on funding round (series_b, source: Crunchbase) and primary_industry (agritech, source: CDAP + SEC EDGAR). MEDDIC score C+ driven by Metrics (3/5) and Economic Buyer (3/5); decision-process visibility limited.

MEDDIC (C+)

  • metrics: 3/5 — Series-B raised $18M April 2025; budget runway clear
  • economic_buyer: 3/5 — CFO identifiable via SEC EDGAR Form D
  • identify_pain: 2/5 — no public-facing pain signals; inferred from segment

Verifier conflict resolution

Industry classification matched cleanly across 3 sources (CDAP, SEC EDGAR, company website self-report). No conflicts.

What you get in Beta